Tag Archives: joe-biden

Power, Pressure, and the Chrisley Name: Why Savannah Might Be Headed for Washington

Leave a reply

Savannah Chrisley teased a U.S. Senate run after fighting for her parents’ freedom. Serious bid or smart PR? Here’s what’s real, what’s hype, and what it takes.

If you’d told me in 2022 that Savannah Chrisley—the quick-witted daughter from Chrisley Knows Best—would one day flirt with a U.S. Senate bid, I’d have said you’ve been watching too much cable. Yet here we are. After two years spent publicly advocating for her parents, Todd and Julie, through convictions, appeals, and (ultimately) presidential pardons in May 2025, Savannah began hinting at “going for the big dog”—a Senate seat. Reuters+2ABC News+2

So…is this real politics or reality-TV residue? Let’s separate signal from noise.

What Savannah actually said—and where

At a Turning Point USA event and in follow-up media clips last summer, Savannah teased a Senate run “in the next three years.” Local and national outlets captured the quote and its context. Later in the fall, she told People she’d hit pause—for now—after her family’s whirlwind return to normal life, emphasizing ongoing interest in reform and mental-health advocacy. Translation: the door’s open, but she’s not walking through it today. Palm Beach Post+2Fox News+2

Her political awakening hasn’t been purely theoretical. In February 2025 she visited the White House to press for her parents’ release, part of a high-visibility campaign that culminated in pardons three months later. FOX 5 Atlanta+1

The Chrisley case, briefly—and carefully

Facts first: Todd and Julie Chrisley were convicted by a federal jury in 2022 on bank-fraud and tax-evasion charges; Julie also faced an obstruction count. They reported to prison in January 2023. Appellate rulings adjusted aspects of Julie’s sentence in 2024, and in May 2025 President Trump granted full pardons to both. A pardon ends the punishment; it does not vacate the convictions. Reuters+3Department of Justice+3People.com+3

Savannah’s advocacy—podcasts, press events, and meetings—kept the case in the headlines and built a political network that now makes a run conceivable. YouTube+1

What it actually takes to run for the U.S. Senate

Constitutional minimums are simple: be at least 30, a U.S. citizen for nine years, and an inhabitant of the state you seek to represent when elected. That’s it. No degree required. U.S. Senate+1

But the real checklist is longer:

  • Declare & file: Once you raise/spend $5,000, you must file FEC Form 2 (Statement of Candidacy) and designate a principal campaign committee. Electronic filing and ongoing reports follow. FEC.gov+2FEC.gov+2
  • Ballot access: Each state adds its own deadlines, fees, and petition signatures. (Prospective Tennesseans: expect a calendar that starts many months ahead of the primary.) [Check your state election site for specifics.]
  • Money & infrastructure: Senate campaigns are brutally expensive. 2024 ad buys alone cracked records, and congressional candidates collectively raised over $1.3B in the ’24 cycle; PAC activity surpassed $3.6B across the system in 2023. Outside money is now a defining feature. Axios+1
  • Profile & résumé norms: While not required, about half of senators typically hold law degrees; nearly all members of Congress have at least a bachelor’s. That’s a norm, not a rule—and celebrity/outside candidates do break it. Congress+1

Could she win—or is this PR?

Pros:
Savannah enters with name ID, a fully formed media apparatus, and a cause (prison reform) that gave her on-camera advocacy reps in very tough rooms. She also has a newly energized base of supporters following her parents’ pardons and a network that crosses entertainment and politics. People.com

Cons:
The same saga that built her platform also polarizes. A Senate race invites forensic scrutiny of the family’s finances and legal history—scrutiny that would be reframed by opponents regardless of the pardon. And the modern Senate is a fundraising marathon; even celebrity campaigns must build a compliant machine to withstand the grind of disclosures, debates, and attack ads. OpenSecrets+1

Is this “propaganda,” a joke—or serious?

The tease itself was real and on-record; the walk-back (not now, maybe later) was also real. That mix—test the waters, bank the press, keep options open—is standard pre-campaign behavior, not a prank. Whether it graduates from sizzle to steak depends on filings, fundraising, staff hires, and a calendar. Until those appear, we’re in “proto-campaign” territory. Palm Beach Post+2Fox News+2

Would she be “the kind of person we want” in a Senate seat?

That’s the voter’s job to decide. Voters regularly weigh lived experience (survived a public ordeal, navigated government systems) against traditional credentials (law, public administration, military, business). History shows the Senate is friendly to lawyers, but it has always had notable outsiders—and outsiders sometimes land a punch precisely because they aren’t from the usual pipeline. Harvard Law Center+1

Can she be “bought”?

Modern campaigns do rely heavily on PACs and outside spending, and the sums keep climbing. That’s a systemic reality, not a Savannah-specific indictment. If she runs, her disclosures and donor mix will be public—trackable in real time on FEC and independent transparency sites like OpenSecrets. Voters who care about independence should monitor those filings, not just the speeches. FEC.gov+1

Bottom line

Savannah Chrisley’s Senate talk isn’t mere clickbait; it’s a plausible next act for a media-savvy advocate who just navigated the most bruising civics lesson imaginable. But a plausible act is not yet a campaign. If the FEC forms, a finance plan, and a field operation appear, then this story moves from tease to test.

Sources & further reading

  • U.S. DOJ, case summary & sentencing (Nov. 21, 2022). Department of Justice
  • Fox 5 Atlanta: White House visit re: parents’ case (Feb. 28, 2025). FOX 5 Atlanta
  • Reuters: Presidential pardons announced (May 27, 2025). Reuters
  • ABC News recap: appeal/resentencing context (May 29, 2025). ABC News
  • Palm Beach Post: Senate-run tease quote (Jul. 16, 2025). Palm Beach Post
  • Fox News video segment: tease at TPUSA (Jul. 13, 2025). Fox News
  • People: “not now” update (Sep. 2025). People.com
  • U.S. Senate: Qualifications. U.S. Senate
  • Constitution Annotated (LOC): Senate qualifications clause. Congress.gov
  • FEC: Candidate registration & Form 2. FEC.gov+1
  • FEC campaign guide & e-filing. FEC.gov+1
  • Pew: degrees in the 118th Congress. Pew Research Center
  • LegiStorm: share of lawyer-legislators (2025). LegiStorm
  • AdImpact/Axios: record Senate ad spend (2024). Axios
  • FEC summary of 2024 cycle money & PAC totals. FEC.gov
  • OpenSecrets: money in politics portal. OpenSecrets

A.L. Childers is the author of over 200 books spanning investigative nonfiction, history, spirituality, political analysis, women’s empowerment, and social commentary. Her writing blends deep research with lived experience, often exploring the systems that shape—and limit—ordinary lives.

Her bestselling titles include:

If you enjoyed this piece, explore Audrey’s books and blog for deeper dives into power, policy, and the people caught in between.

Disclaimer

The following article is reported commentary based on publicly available records, reputable news reporting, and on-the-record statements. It does not assert, imply, or intend to convey any new factual allegations about any person beyond those sources. A presidential pardon ends punishment but does not overturn or expunge a conviction unless specified by a court; readers should consult official dockets and FEC filings for the most current legal and campaign information. All opinions herein are those of the author. Nothing in this article should be construed as legal advice, an accusation of criminal conduct beyond the cited records, or an endorsement/opposition of any candidate. Corrections will be made upon receipt of verifiable documentation.

The Crisis at the Border: Migrants, Anchor Babies, and the Missing Children Under the Biden Administration

Leave a reply

Under the Biden administration, the U.S. has seen a surge in migrants crossing the southern border, with many being flown to sanctuary cities across the country. This has raised significant concerns about the handling of immigration and asylum cases, particularly regarding the thousands of unaccompanied children who have crossed the border, many of whom are now unaccounted for. Additionally, debates have intensified over the concept of “anchor babies” and how it differs from the current influx of migrant children.

Flying Migrants to Sanctuary Cities
In response to the overwhelming number of migrants arriving at the southern border, the Biden administration has been transporting migrants, including asylum seekers and undocumented individuals, to sanctuary cities across the U.S. Cities like New York, Chicago, Los Angeles, and Washington D.C. have seen a large influx of migrants flown in by the federal government. These sanctuary cities offer protection from local authorities cooperating with federal immigration enforcement, which means migrants can live there with reduced fear of deportation.

This practice, however, has drawn criticism from both local leaders and citizens. In New York City alone, officials estimate that the cost of housing, feeding, and providing services to these migrants could exceed $1 billion annually. Local resources, including shelters and healthcare services, are being stretched to their limits, and city officials have expressed concern over the long-term impact this policy could have on their infrastructure and budgets.

Anchor Babies vs. Migrant Children Crossing the Border
The term “anchor baby” refers to a child born in the U.S. to non-citizen parents, particularly undocumented immigrants. Under the 14th Amendment, any child born on U.S. soil is automatically a U.S. citizen. The concern among some is that undocumented parents may use their child’s citizenship to secure legal status for themselves in the future. However, U.S. immigration law does not grant parents of U.S.-born children automatic legal status; the child must be at least 21 years old to petition for their parents, and even then, the process is not guaranteed.

The current administration’s approach, however, is not about children born in the U.S. but rather about migrant children crossing the border, either unaccompanied or with family members. These children do not receive automatic citizenship simply by crossing into the U.S. Instead, they are subject to immigration law, which may allow them to stay temporarily while their cases are processed. Many are placed in the custody of Health and Human Services (HHS) and later released to sponsors within the U.S., often family members.

This distinction is critical. While “anchor babies” refers to children born in the U.S., the children crossing the border are seeking asylum or other protections and do not have citizenship rights. The difference lies in their legal status—one group is automatically granted citizenship, while the other must navigate a complex legal process to determine their future in the country.

The Missing 300,000 Children
One of the most alarming aspects of the current immigration crisis is the case of the 300,000 unaccounted-for children who have crossed the border under the Biden administration. These children, often labeled as unaccompanied minors, were initially placed in the care of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) but have since disappeared from official records. This has raised serious concerns about their safety and well-being.

These children were supposed to be released to sponsors in the U.S., such as family members or legal guardians. However, many have fallen through the cracks, and HHS has been unable to track their whereabouts. Investigations have revealed that some of these children may be at risk of exploitation, human trafficking, or other dangers. The lack of oversight and accountability in their cases has led to significant public outcry, yet the government has not provided clear answers about where these children are or how they lost track of such a large number of minors.

Former officials and immigration advocates have raised concerns about the poor coordination between federal agencies responsible for the welfare of these children. The New York Times and The Associated Press have reported that hundreds of these children may be in dangerous situations, forced into child labor, or living in precarious conditions without proper adult supervision.

The Impact of the Biden Administration’s Policies
The Biden administration’s immigration policies, including the broad use of asylum claims and transporting migrants to sanctuary cities, have fundamentally reshaped the U.S. immigration landscape. Supporters argue that these policies reflect a more compassionate approach to immigration, allowing individuals and families fleeing violence and persecution a chance at a better life.

However, critics argue that these policies have led to chaos at the border, incentivized illegal immigration, and strained local resources in cities where migrants are sent. The record number of migrants, combined with the massive backlog in the asylum system and the unclear fate of hundreds of thousands of children, has raised questions about the long-term viability of the administration’s approach.

Conclusion
The U.S. is at a crossroads in its immigration policy, and the current crisis at the border highlights the challenges of balancing humanitarian concerns with the need for border security and accountability. The missing 300,000 children, the influx of migrants flown to sanctuary cities, and the confusion over “anchor babies” versus migrant children crossing the border underscore the complexity of the issue.

As the nation continues to grapple with these challenges, it’s clear that solutions must be found to ensure the safety of children, the fair treatment of asylum seekers, and the preservation of resources for all Americans.

References:

  1. U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), “Southwest Land Border Encounters,” 2022.
  2. Health and Human Services (HHS), “Unaccompanied Children Released to Sponsors,” 2023.
  3. The New York Times, “Missing Migrant Children: Thousands at Risk,” 2023.
  4. The Associated Press, “Federal Agencies Struggle to Track Migrant Children,” 2022.
  5. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), “Statistics on Immigration Court Attendance,” 2022.
  6. The New York Times, “Costs of Sheltering Asylum Seekers in New York City,” 2023.

T

The American Dream Under Siege: How Immigration and Government Failures Are Crushing Veterans and Taxpayers

Leave a reply

While millions of undocumented migrants are being flown into sanctuary cities across the U.S. and receiving benefits, many of the very people who fought to defend the country—American veterans—are sleeping on the streets. The U.S. government has failed to properly care for these heroes, with countless veterans unable to access basic healthcare, housing, or mental health services. Homeless veterans are criminalized for living on the streets, a tragic irony in a country they once defended. Meanwhile, hardworking Americans who pay taxes find themselves unable to afford the rising cost of living due to inflation and housing prices that have skyrocketed under the current administration.

Veterans Forgotten by Their Own Country
The plight of homeless veterans in the U.S. is a long-standing issue, but under the current administration, it has worsened. According to the National Coalition for Homeless Veterans, there are an estimated 40,000 homeless veterans on any given night, many suffering from mental health issues or substance abuse due to their time in combat. Despite their service to the country, these veterans are often left without the resources or support they need to reintegrate into society. Instead of receiving care and dignity, they are treated as criminals for sleeping on the streets in cities that have made homelessness illegal.

Meanwhile, the government continues to allocate resources to migrants crossing the southern border, many of whom are provided housing, healthcare, and legal assistance. This disparity highlights the misallocation of priorities. How can the government afford to house and care for migrants while neglecting the veterans who risked their lives to defend this country?

The Economic Squeeze on American Taxpayers
For everyday Americans, the cost of living has become unbearable. Inflation has soared under the current administration, pushing the price of housing, groceries, and basic necessities to levels that make it nearly impossible for middle- and working-class families to survive. The average price of a home has skyrocketed, and rental prices have followed suit. The National Association of Realtors reports that home prices have increased by over 20% in many areas since 2021, leaving Americans with few affordable housing options.

Despite paying taxes “out the ass,” as many Americans would describe it, they receive little in return. Healthcare remains expensive, education costs continue to climb, and public services are underfunded. For many Americans, the American Dream—owning a home, raising a family, and achieving financial stability—is slipping further out of reach. Instead of providing relief to its taxpaying citizens, the government is focused on managing the influx of migrants, offering them benefits that many Americans struggle to access.

A Calculated Political Strategy?
Some critics argue that the administration’s open-border policies and willingness to welcome millions of migrants may be part of a political strategy. By creating chaos and flooding the country with new voters, they aim to secure future election victories. The migrants who benefit from these policies may feel a sense of loyalty to the party that provided them with asylum and resources, potentially skewing future elections in favor of those who orchestrated this influx.

As President Trump warned, “They’re not after me, they’re after you. I’m just in the way.” The chaos and instability being created through the government’s immigration policies are designed to keep the average American off balance, too distracted to see the real damage being done to their freedoms and livelihoods. The chaos acts as a smokescreen, making it harder for Americans to recognize what’s up or down in the political landscape.

Historical Parallels: A Government’s Strategy of Control
The strategy of using immigration and chaos to destabilize a nation’s population is not unique to the U.S. Historically, regimes in other countries have employed similar tactics to maintain power and control.

  • The Roman Empire: At the height of its decline, Rome began to bring in large numbers of outsiders to fill its military ranks and workforce, diluting the cultural and political influence of native Romans. This weakened the unity of the empire and ultimately contributed to its downfall. The lesson is clear: when a government prioritizes new populations over its existing citizens, instability and collapse follow.
  • Venezuela: Under Hugo Chávez, the Venezuelan government welcomed thousands of immigrants and extended broad social benefits to them while neglecting its native population. The government’s policies were used to secure votes from these new residents, ensuring Chávez’s continued rule, even as the country plunged into economic disaster. Today, Venezuela is a cautionary tale of how political manipulation and the erosion of a stable economy can lead to the collapse of a once-thriving nation.
  • Nazi Germany: In the years leading up to World War II, the Nazi regime used a combination of propaganda and scapegoating to keep the German people distracted and in line. By creating enemies both foreign and domestic, they were able to centralize power and manipulate the population into supporting destructive policies. As the German people were kept in a state of confusion and fear, the government took greater control over their lives.

The Missing 300,000 Children: A Silent Crisis
Compounding this crisis is the fate of over 300,000 unaccompanied children who crossed the border under the current administration and are now unaccounted for. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) initially placed these children with sponsors across the U.S., but there has been little to no follow-up, and many of these children have simply disappeared. Investigative reports from sources like The New York Times have raised concerns that some of these children may be at risk of human trafficking, forced labor, or other forms of exploitation.

Despite these alarming figures, the government has not provided clear answers on the whereabouts of these children or why the system failed so dramatically. This silent crisis has raised serious questions about the administration’s competence in handling immigration and the protection of vulnerable minors.

Conclusion: The American Dream at a Crossroads
The current administration’s immigration policies, combined with its failure to care for veterans and provide relief to hardworking taxpayers, are crushing the American Dream. Inflation is making it impossible for families to afford homes or even basic necessities, while the government allocates resources to migrants. The rise in housing costs and the strain on local infrastructure are pushing Americans to their breaking point.

History has shown that when governments use chaos and division to control their citizens, it is the people who suffer. Unless something changes, the U.S. may be heading down a similar path. It’s time for the government to prioritize its citizens—the veterans who fought for this country, the taxpayers who keep the nation running, and the families struggling to stay afloat—before it’s too late.

References:

  1. National Coalition for Homeless Veterans, “Homelessness Among U.S. Veterans,” 2022.
  2. National Association of Realtors, “Housing Market Trends,” 2023.
  3. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), “Unaccompanied Children Released to Sponsors,” 2023.
  4. The New York Times, “Missing Migrant Children: Thousands at Risk,” 2023.
  5. The Associated Press, “Federal Agencies Struggle to Track Migrant Children,” 2022.
  6. The Atlantic, “The Fall of the Roman Empire: Lessons for Modern America,” 2022.
  7. U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), “Southwest Land Border Encounters,” 2022.

America on the Brink: The Looming Economic Crisis and Political Consequences

Leave a reply

Dear fellow Americans,

As we approach the 2024 presidential election, it is imperative to examine the state of our nation and the choices we face. This is a critical message to those who consider themselves informed liberals and progressives, yet may have overlooked the significant economic challenges created by the current administration. The reality is that many average Americans are struggling to afford basic necessities, while our borders remain open and resources are allocated to immigrants. This disparity is leading to a growing financial burden on taxpayers.

Our economy is suffering due to reckless monetary policies, akin to water flowing unchecked down the Nile. The influx of immigrants into our cities has indirectly impacted every American, driving up the cost of living and making everyday expenses unaffordable. Despite this, our government continues to send substantial financial aid abroad, such as the over $100 billion sent to Ukraine, while many Americans are homeless and hungry.

If Kamala Harris wins the presidency in 2024, she will inherit an economic depression that was initially expected to befall Donald Trump. The current administration has already set the stage for this downturn. Harris’s track record raises concerns about her ability to lead during such a crisis. Her past actions, including the incarceration of innocent black men for minor offenses and the use of cheap labor, have demonstrated a lack of empathy and sound judgment. One notable case involved her office withholding exculpatory evidence, almost costing an innocent man his life.

Her record suggests she has not significantly contributed to the betterment of the black community, and her policies often seem more focused on maintaining political power than addressing the needs of everyday Americans. If Donald Trump were to assume the presidency, he would undoubtedly face relentless scrutiny and opposition. However, we must consider which administration is better equipped to navigate the impending economic crisis.

The looming depression is real and imminent. If we are not already feeling its effects, we soon will. This crisis will reveal the fragility of the systems we rely on, systems that are being strained by current policies. It is crucial to question whether we want to endure this economic hardship under an administration led by Kamala Harris.

We need to rethink our national direction. The current political establishment has often seemed disconnected from the struggles of ordinary Americans. We are confronted with issues like the proliferation of unhealthy food, contaminated water, and an unaffordable healthcare system, all driven by profit-seeking corporations. Facing a depression without effective leadership could be disastrous.

Kamala Harris’s priorities, such as gun control and gender issues, may seem misaligned with the immediate needs of a nation facing economic collapse. It is not about being dismissive of her identity as a woman of color, but about evaluating her policies and leadership effectiveness during a crisis. The economic downturn was anticipated to challenge Donald Trump’s leadership; voting for Harris could mean she will bear the brunt of this crisis instead.

As Americans, we must remain informed and vigilant. The future of our nation depends on the decisions we make now. It is essential to prioritize competent leadership that addresses the real issues facing our country. This is not about political allegiance, but about ensuring the well-being of all Americans during these challenging times.

Sincerely, A Concerned American Citizen

A Dire Warning for America: The Looming Economic Depression and Political Turmoil

Leave a reply

Dear fellow Americans,

As we stand on the precipice of the 2024 presidential election, it is crucial to reflect on the state of our nation and the direction in which we are headed. This is a message to educated liberals and progressives who may have overlooked the obvious economic disaster created by the current administration. The average American is struggling to make ends meet, yet our borders remain open, and immigrants receive free housing, food, healthcare, and money vouchers. Meanwhile, taxpayers are left starving and footing the bill. It’s time to recognize that we can’t afford to be progressive anymore.

The unrestricted printing of money is akin to water flowing down the Nile River. The open borders have flooded every city, indirectly impacting every American and driving the cost of living out of reach. We can’t afford to fund Ukraine’s democracy with over $100 billion while Americans are starving on the streets and thousands become homeless daily. We can’t afford to fund Iran while our own citizens suffer.

Here’s the point: if Kamala Harris wins the 2024 presidency, she will inherit the economic depression that was meant for Donald Trump. The current administration has already set the stage for this economic downturn, and Harris’s track record has shown her incompetence. Over the past three years, she has proven her inability to lead, with a history of putting innocent black men in jail for minor offenses, using them for cheap labor, and even laughing about it. One man almost lost his life on death row because her office refused to release evidence that proved his innocence, despite a court order. Her resume speaks volumes, yet some still argue that she should be president. Why?

She has done nothing for the black community. Her policies and actions disqualify her from being the leader of our country. If Donald Trump were to become president, he would face constant harassment, coups, or worse. We need to ask ourselves which administration we want to be under during this impending depression. This depression is real and imminent. If you aren’t already hungry, you will be soon. It will expose the very systems we depend on and are currently trying to dismantle.

We need a national divorce. The establishment has made a fool out of the American people. We have no business sharing a union with liberals and progressives who fight to keep this crazy ideology, willing to sacrifice everything to maintain it. We are being fed fake food, our water is poisoned, and we can’t afford our healthcare system, all of which are run by corporations that profit off our suffering. We would be safer facing a depression without Kamala Harris and everything she stands for. She cares nothing about the American citizen. She is a puppet, focused on pleasing her handlers, taking our guns, and fixating on issues like gender, while we face a future where we must protect our resources and food to avoid starvation.

Do you want this laughing demon to be in charge? I am not trying to be rude, but I hope her skin color and being a woman can get you through the depression ahead. I hope it feeds your starving family and shelters them from what is coming to our American land. This economic disaster was meant to fall on Donald Trump’s lap, but if you vote for Kamala Harris, you got played. This country is a business, and we need to understand that.

Stay informed, stay vigilant, and make your voice heard. The future of our nation depends on it.

Sincerely, A Concerned American

The American Spectacle: A Nation in Decline

Leave a reply

A Nation on the Brink: Reflections on the Biden-Trump Debate

The recent debate between Joe Biden and Donald Trump should be a wake-up call to America’s global victims who might have feared that a new administration could reverse the country’s decline on the world stage. One thing became abundantly clear: the American empire will not recover from the turmoil of recent years, regardless of who steps into office next. America is on a downward spiral, and so are its citizens.

Economic Collapse and Social Decay

Consider the skyrocketing inflation: groceries are now ten times more expensive than they were a few years ago, and housing costs have become unaffordable for many. Lives have been shattered, small businesses shut down, and homelessness is rising at an alarming rate. The debate highlighted the rot within the American government, a spectacle that laid bare the grim reality.

War Crimes and International Law

This administration, along with many before it, could be held accountable for war crimes. The U.S. treats international law as an afterthought. Biden admitted during the debate that funding for the Ukraine war is essentially a money-laundering operation benefiting arms manufacturers. Americans are aware of this, but their voices are silenced. The January 6th incident is a prime example: it has been revealed that the FBI orchestrated the event to make it appear as an attack, leading to the imprisonment of many innocent people.

Government Corruption and Corporate Greed

Why do U.S. tax dollars funnel into the private sector? If America truly upheld ethics and morals, this would be scandalous. Most Americans possess strong ethical and moral values, but the government and its agencies commit atrocities both domestically and globally. The debate was a nauseating display of contempt for the American people, a clear demonstration of the power structures’ disdain.

The Power Structures’ Mascots

Biden and Trump are mere mascots for different power structures. Biden’s cognitive decline has been painfully evident, and the way his wife speaks to him post-debate, as if he were a child, is telling. Meanwhile, Trump’s rhetoric and policies serve another set of powerful interests. Both candidates embody the decay of American politics.

A System Beyond Repair

The tragic reality is that America’s decline is inevitable. The country’s behavior, rooted in decades of corruption and manipulation, spells doom for its future. The rest of the world watched the debate with a mix of amusement and pity, knowing the difference between American citizens and those in power. The debate mocked the American people, making it clear that neither candidate will bring about meaningful change.

Delusional Confidence and Corporate Profit

The Democrats’ waning confidence in Biden is ironic. What initially inspired confidence in his leadership? It’s all a money racket, a cycle of laundering funds through foreign operations to benefit lobbyists and big corporations. Look at the American food market: it’s legal to poison citizens with unhealthy, fake food, contributing to chronic diseases and obesity. The sicker Americans become, the more profit the government and its agencies make.

A Silenced Nation

The recent Supreme Court ruling on social media has given the government even more power to silence dissent. They have successfully neutralized the American citizenry, blurring cognition, distracting, and demoralizing the populace to a critical coma.

Conclusion

The debate on June 27, 2024, was more than just a political event; it was a stark reminder of the systemic corruption and decline of the American empire. It’s a call to awareness, urging citizens to recognize the deep-seated issues plaguing their nation. While the future seems bleak, acknowledging these truths is the first step towards reclaiming power and demanding change.

Did you watch the debate?

If so, what are your thoughts?